Jamie Iles wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
Hi Jamie,

> On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 01:48:22PM +0900, Sangbeom Kim wrote:
> > And Do you mean that Is needed error handling of clk_enable  like
> > below?
> >
> >     clk_enable(timerclk);
> >
> >     if (IS_ERR(timerclk)){
> >             clk_put(timerclk)
> >             panic("failed to enable timers clock");
> >     }
> 
> No, clk_enable() returns negative errno on failure, so something like.
> 
>       if (clk_enable(timerclk))
>               panic("failed to enable timerclk");
> 
Thanks for your suggestion.

Yeah, would be better...but I'm thinking we _really_ need that.
Because it is used timer clock, so if fails, maybe happened hang :(

> > There is no another clk_enable for timerclk.
> 
> I didn't mean for just timerclk, there are several other clk_enable()'s
> for other clks.

Thanks.

Best regards,
Kgene.
--
Kukjin Kim <[email protected]>, Senior Engineer,
SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to