On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 05:47:28PM +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> +static void pl330_tasklet_cyclic(unsigned long data)
> +{
> + struct dma_pl330_chan *pch = (struct dma_pl330_chan *)data;
> + struct dma_pl330_desc *desc, *_dt;
> + unsigned long flags;
> + LIST_HEAD(list);
> +
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&pch->lock, flags);
> +
> + /* Pick up ripe tomatoes */
> + list_for_each_entry_safe(desc, _dt, &pch->work_list, node)
> + if ((desc->status == DONE) && desc->cyclic) {
> + dma_async_tx_callback callback;
> +
> + list_move_tail(&desc->node, &pch->work_list);
> + pch->completed = desc->txd.cookie;
> +
> + desc->status = PREP;
> +
> + /* Try to submit a req imm.
> + next to the last completed cookie */
> + fill_queue(pch);
> +
> + /* Make sure the PL330 Channel thread is active */
> + pl330_chan_ctrl(pch->pl330_chid, PL330_OP_START);
> +
> + callback = desc->txd.callback;
> + if (callback)
> + callback(desc->txd.callback_param);
How does this work when callbacks are allowed to queue new requests?
Aren't you going to deadlock on the spinlock?
I don't see 'list' being used in this function either.
> +
> + }
> +
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pch->lock, flags);
> +}
> +
> +static void pl330_cyclic_free(struct dma_pl330_chan *pch)
> +{
> + struct dma_pl330_dmac *pdmac = pch->dmac;
> + struct dma_pl330_desc *desc, *_dt;
> + unsigned long flags;
> + LIST_HEAD(list);
> +
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&pdmac->pool_lock, flags);
> +
> + list_for_each_entry_safe(desc, _dt, &pch->work_list, node)
> + if (desc->cyclic)
> + list_move_tail(&desc->node, &list);
> +
> + list_splice_tail_init(&list, &pdmac->desc_pool);
As you're not using 'list' after this point, would 'list_splice_tail'
do here?
> +
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pdmac->pool_lock, flags);
> + pch->cyclic_task = NULL;
> +}
> +
> static void pl330_tasklet(unsigned long data)
> {
> struct dma_pl330_chan *pch = (struct dma_pl330_chan *)data;
> @@ -227,6 +285,9 @@ static void dma_pl330_rqcb(void *token, enum pl330_op_err
> err)
>
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pch->lock, flags);
>
> + if (pch->cyclic_task)
> + tasklet_schedule(pch->cyclic_task);
> + else
> tasklet_schedule(&pch->task);
This 'tasklet_schedule' wants to be indented.
> }
>
> @@ -256,25 +317,58 @@ static int pl330_alloc_chan_resources(struct dma_chan
> *chan)
> static int pl330_control(struct dma_chan *chan, enum dma_ctrl_cmd cmd,
> unsigned long arg)
> {
> struct dma_pl330_chan *pch = to_pchan(chan);
> - struct dma_pl330_desc *desc;
> + struct dma_pl330_desc *desc, *_dt;
> unsigned long flags;
> + struct dma_pl330_dmac *pdmac = pch->dmac;
> + struct dma_slave_config *slave_config;
> + struct dma_pl330_peri *peri;
> + int i;
> + LIST_HEAD(list);
>
> - /* Only supports DMA_TERMINATE_ALL */
> - if (cmd != DMA_TERMINATE_ALL)
> - return -ENXIO;
> -
> - spin_lock_irqsave(&pch->lock, flags);
> -
> - /* FLUSH the PL330 Channel thread */
> - pl330_chan_ctrl(pch->pl330_chid, PL330_OP_FLUSH);
> + switch (cmd) {
> + case DMA_TERMINATE_ALL:
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&pch->lock, flags);
>
> - /* Mark all desc done */
> - list_for_each_entry(desc, &pch->work_list, node)
> - desc->status = DONE;
> + /* FLUSH the PL330 Channel thread */
> + pl330_chan_ctrl(pch->pl330_chid, PL330_OP_FLUSH);
>
> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pch->lock, flags);
> + /* Mark all desc done */
> + list_for_each_entry_safe(desc, _dt, &pch->work_list , node) {
> + desc->status = DONE;
> + pch->completed = desc->txd.cookie;
> + list_move_tail(&desc->node, &list);
> + }
>
> - pl330_tasklet((unsigned long) pch);
> + list_splice_tail_init(&list, &pdmac->desc_pool);
Again, would list_splice_tail() do here?
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pch->lock, flags);
> + break;
> + case DMA_SLAVE_CONFIG:
> + slave_config = (struct dma_slave_config *)arg;
> + peri = pch->chan.private;
> +
> + if (slave_config->direction == DMA_TO_DEVICE) {
> + if (slave_config->dst_addr)
> + peri->fifo_addr = slave_config->dst_addr;
> + if (slave_config->dst_addr_width) {
> + i = 0;
> + while (slave_config->dst_addr_width != (1 << i))
> + i++;
> + peri->burst_sz = i;
> + }
> + } else if (slave_config->direction == DMA_FROM_DEVICE) {
> + if (slave_config->src_addr)
> + peri->fifo_addr = slave_config->src_addr;
> + if (slave_config->src_addr_width) {
> + i = 0;
> + while (slave_config->src_addr_width != (1 << i))
> + i++;
> + peri->burst_sz = i;
> + }
> + }
It would make more sense to store the M2P and P2M address/width/burst size
separately, so you don't have to make DMA_SLAVE_CONFIG calls before every
transfer.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
