Greg KH wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 11:57:16AM +0000, Jingoo Han wrote: > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Greg KH [mailto:[email protected]] > > > Sent: Friday, November 18, 2011 4:12 AM > > > To: Jingoo Han > > > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; > > > [email protected]; [email protected]; > > > [email protected]; [email protected]; > [email protected]; > > > [email protected] > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Support Samsung S5P OHCI device and driver > > > > > > On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 06:49:58AM +0000, Jingoo Han wrote: > > > > Hello. > > > > > > > > This patch series adds USB OHCI device and initial driver for > Samsung > > > > S5P SoCs and is based from Linux 3.2-rc1. I have tested on SMDKV310 > > > board > > > > using EXYNOS4. > > > > > > This is to be sent through some arm tree, not the usb tree, right? > > Right, 1st and 2nd patch are sent throught arm tree. > > However, 3rd patch is sent through the usb tree. > > Thanks. > > [PATCH 1/3] ARM: SAMSUNG: Add USB OHCI device > > [PATCH 2/3] ARM: EXYNOS: Add USB OHCI support to SMDKV310 board > > [PATCH 3/3] USB: Add S5P OHCI diver > Hi Greg,
Sorry for late response. I came back today from family vacation... Anyway, > So the third patch does not depend on the first two? If it does, that > means I will get build errors in the USB tree when I apply that patch, > right? > > If so, then all three should go through a single tree. > Yes, right. This series would be handled in same tree so that we can avoid useless conflicts. I commented small thing on 3rd patch. So I think, if you're ok on his updated patch, it can be sent to upstream via Samsung tree. Or your tree with my ack? Thanks. Best regards, Kgene. -- Kukjin Kim <[email protected]>, Senior Engineer, SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
