Hi Kgene, Am Dienstag, 20. Dezember 2011, 14:34:58 schrieb Kukjin Kim: > On 12/20/11 22:18, Heiko Stübner wrote: > > Am Dienstag, 20. Dezember 2011, 13:48:36 schrieb Kukjin Kim: > >> Hook these platforms restart code into the new restart hook rather > >> than using arch_reset(). > >> And adds local header file, common.h in arch/arm/mach-s3c2410/ and > >> arch/arm/mach-s3c2440/ directories. > >> > >> Cc: Ben Dooks<[email protected]> > >> Cc: Russell King<[email protected]> > >> Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim<[email protected]> > > > > just for my understanding would it not also be possible to move the > > function prototype to plat-samsung/include/plat/s3c2410.h and s3c244x.h? > > Yeah, we have many choices about that and I will sort out the > mach-s3c24.. directories to mach-s3c24xx or just mach-s3c... > > > Or should these files vanish in the long run? > > Yes, as per Russell's suggestion, I think we don't need that and as a > note, I'm working on removing plat-s3c24xx and plat-s5p, just keeping > one plat-samsung.
I'm currently working on introducing a power-domain for the usb-phy of the S3C2443/S3C2416/S3C2450. This is one step mimicing the work of Mark Brown to get better idle handling later on, and also again reduces the number of architecture-calls the hsudc driver does, as requested by Felipe Balbi. Therefore I'm introducing a new s3c2443-pm-common.c. Question now is, should this move directly to plat-samsung? Thanks Heiko -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
