On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 03:24:56PM +0530, Tushar Behera wrote:

 > >>> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c 
 > >>> b/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c
 > >>> index 5467879..7cfb516 100644
 > >>> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c
 > >>> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c
 > >>> @@ -210,6 +210,8 @@ static int exynos_cpufreq_cpu_init(struct 
 > >>> cpufreq_policy *policy)
 > >>>  
 > >>>          cpufreq_frequency_table_get_attr(exynos_info->freq_table, 
 > >>> policy->cpu);
 > >>>  
 > >>> +        locking_frequency = exynos_getspeed(0);
 > >>> +
 > >>>          /* set the transition latency value */
 > >>>          policy->cpuinfo.transition_latency = 100000;
 > 
 > Any concerns with this patch?

it's in my queue for applying to -next. I'll clear everything out today.

        Dave

 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to