Jassi Brar wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 5:52 AM, Kukjin Kim <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > And since she has been doing these updates on behalf of Samsung, she has > > added attribution to Samsung also (which you never did while at Samsung). > > > What the bloody fuck ?!! > Don't blame :( Why should I listen that from you.
> Can't you read this ? ..... > As I know, the Copyright can belong to a person or company. See my patches in mainline. I meant that. Of course, it depends on writer. > ------------------------- > /* linux/drivers/dma/pl330.c > * > * Copyright (C) 2010 Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. > * Jaswinder Singh <[email protected]> > * > ------------------------- > > I challenge you to show 1 file that I wrote while in Samsung which > doesn't show Samsung as the copyright holder. > See above. > > > > And, I don't think some patches are more important than the other. > > All patches, simple or complex, help in improving the code. > > > Bloody rant. Who said any type of patch is useless or doesn't improve > code?! > > I said, and still say, merging two files written by same person doesn't > grant you the right to add your own name as one of the authors. > > And if you think Boojin's patches were any great (even after discounting > the number of iterations they took), Javi Merino's name should be added > before Boojin's. Unfortunately, I couldn't find his name for dma/pl330.c from my side and if required, he can do it later. Why should I do? I'm very unhappy with this talking and I think, there is no more useful talking with you. I'd like to know opinions from Russell King(ARM maintainer) or Vinod Koul (DMA maintainer) for this. Thanks. Best regards, Kgene. -- Kukjin Kim <[email protected]>, Senior Engineer, SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
