Hi, Am Mittwoch, 25. April 2012, 06:19:39 schrieb Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL- VILLARD: > On 09:42 Wed 25 Apr , Tushar Behera wrote: > > There are some helper macros (DEFINE_RES_XXX) for defining resource > > structures. This patchset migrates all the earlier resource > > definitions (within Samsung specific code base) to use these macros. > > > > In some cases, it was not possible to use DEFINE_RES_IRQ() macro because > > of usage of additional flags. In those cases, DEFINE_RES_NAMED() macro > > is used instead. > > > > The patches are rebased on top of Kukjin's for-next branch at this > > commit. > > > > d0ee53a Merge branch 'next/board-samsung' into for-next > > is this really necessary as we switch to DT this code will be droped
As far as I know legacy SoCs are allowed to keep being non-DT and I don't see the older Samsung SoCs (especially the S3C24XX ones) changing to DT anytime soon, as they don't see any new development but only bug fixes currently. > for my point of view it's cosmetics change it is, but it also makes the code more readable Heiko -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
