On 04/25/2012 10:21 PM, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> Hello.
>
> On 04/25/2012 08:12 AM, Tushar Behera wrote:
>
>> CC: Ben Dooks<[email protected]>
>> CC: Kukjin Kim<[email protected]>
>> Signed-off-by: Tushar Behera<[email protected]>
>> ---
>> arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/mach-qt2410.c | 12 ++----------
>> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/mach-qt2410.c
>> b/arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/mach-qt2410.c
>> index 91c16d9..b868ddd 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/mach-qt2410.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/mach-qt2410.c
>> @@ -180,16 +180,8 @@ static struct s3c2410fb_mach_info qt2410_fb_info
>> __initdata = {
>> /* CS8900 */
>>
>> static struct resource qt2410_cs89x0_resources[] = {
>> - [0] = {
>> - .start = 0x19000000,
>> - .end = 0x19000000 + 16,
>
> Are you sure there was no mistake here, with - 1 missing? It looks
> suspicious...
>
I was not very sure here, whether the original author intended to have
the memory resource to be 16 byte wide or 17 byte wide. So I went with
the original implementation. Though I must agree, 16-byte width looks
more plausible.
>> - .flags = IORESOURCE_MEM,
>> - },
>> - [1] = {
>> - .start = IRQ_EINT9,
>> - .end = IRQ_EINT9,
>> - .flags = IORESOURCE_IRQ,
>> - },
>> + [0] = DEFINE_RES_MEM(0x19000000, 17),
>> + [1] = DEFINE_RES_IRQ(IRQ_EINT9),
>> };
>>
>> static struct platform_device qt2410_cs89x0 = {
>
> WBR, Sergei
--
Tushar Behera
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
