Hi Kukjin,

> Lukasz Majewski wrote:
> > 
> > This patch supports to control usb otg phy of EXYNOS4210.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Joonyoung Shim <[email protected]>
> > Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <[email protected]>
> > [Rebased on the newest git/kgene/linux-samsung #for-next]
> > Signed-off-by: Lukasz Majewski <[email protected]>
> > ---
> >  arch/arm/mach-exynos/include/mach/irqs.h     |    1 +
> >  arch/arm/mach-exynos/include/mach/map.h      |    4 +
> >  arch/arm/mach-exynos/include/mach/regs-pmu.h |    3 +
> >  arch/arm/mach-exynos/setup-usb-phy.c         |   95
> +++++++++++++++++++-----
> > --
> >  4 files changed, 78 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
> > 
> 
> [...]
> 
> Hi Lukasz,
> 
> I have small comments on this.
> 
> > +static int exynos4_usb_phy0_init(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > +{
> > +   u32 rstcon;
> > +
> > +   writel(readl(S5P_USBDEVICE_PHY_CONTROL) |
> > S5P_USBDEVICE_PHY_ENABLE,
> > +                   S5P_USBDEVICE_PHY_CONTROL);
> > +
> > +   exynos4_usb_phy_clkset(pdev);
> > +
> > +   /* set to normal PHY0 */
> > +   writel((readl(EXYNOS4_PHYPWR) & ~PHY0_NORMAL_MASK),
> > EXYNOS4_PHYPWR); +
> > +   /* reset PHY0 and Link */
> > +   rstcon = readl(EXYNOS4_RSTCON) | PHY0_SWRST_MASK;
> > +   writel(rstcon, EXYNOS4_RSTCON);
> > +   udelay(10);
> > +
> > +   rstcon &= ~PHY0_SWRST_MASK;
> > +   writel(rstcon, EXYNOS4_RSTCON);
> > +   udelay(80);
> 
> Do we _really_ need above udelay(80)?
> 
> As I know, we only need it in the phy1_init() for EHCI and we don't
> need it here.

I will test if this removal not break anything. 

> 
> [...]
> 
> >  int s5p_usb_phy_init(struct platform_device *pdev, int type)
> >  {
> > -   if (type == S5P_USB_PHY_HOST)
> > +   if (type == S5P_USB_PHY_DEVICE)
> > +           return exynos4_usb_phy0_init(pdev);
> 
> I think, this should be exynos4210_usb_phy0_init(pdev), because this
> is available on only exynos4210 not 

> exynos4x12 and exynos5.

I will change the name and submit a patch.

> 
> > +   else if (type == S5P_USB_PHY_HOST)
> >             return exynos4_usb_phy1_init(pdev);
> 
> Same as above.
> 
> > 
> >     return -EINVAL;
> > @@ -144,7 +187,9 @@ int s5p_usb_phy_init(struct platform_device
> > *pdev, int type)
> > 
> >  int s5p_usb_phy_exit(struct platform_device *pdev, int type)
> >  {
> > -   if (type == S5P_USB_PHY_HOST)
> > +   if (type == S5P_USB_PHY_DEVICE)
> > +           return exynos4_usb_phy0_exit(pdev);
> 
> Same as above.
> 
> > +   else if (type == S5P_USB_PHY_HOST)
> >             return exynos4_usb_phy1_exit(pdev);
> 
> Same as above.
> 
> If you're ok on my comments, could you please update it as soon as
> possible for v3.5?

I will prepare a patch.

> 
> Thanks.
> 
> Best regards,
> Kgene.
> --
> Kukjin Kim <[email protected]>, Senior Engineer,
> SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
> 



-- 
Best regards,

Lukasz Majewski

Samsung Poland R&D Center | Linux Platform Group
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to