They have very few users and they're both just doing a single register
write so the advantage of having the macro is a bit limited. An inline
function might make sense but it's as easy to just do the writes directly.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broo...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.wall...@linaro.org>
---
drivers/spi/spi-s3c64xx.c | 12 ++++--------
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-s3c64xx.c b/drivers/spi/spi-s3c64xx.c
index b7aeb5d..3514ef9 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/spi-s3c64xx.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi-s3c64xx.c
@@ -74,11 +74,6 @@
#define S3C64XX_SPI_SLAVE_AUTO (1<<1)
#define S3C64XX_SPI_SLAVE_SIG_INACT (1<<0)
-#define S3C64XX_SPI_ACT(c) writel(0, (c)->regs + S3C64XX_SPI_SLAVE_SEL)
-
-#define S3C64XX_SPI_DEACT(c) writel(S3C64XX_SPI_SLAVE_SIG_INACT, \
- (c)->regs + S3C64XX_SPI_SLAVE_SEL)
-
#define S3C64XX_SPI_INT_TRAILING_EN (1<<6)
#define S3C64XX_SPI_INT_RX_OVERRUN_EN (1<<5)
#define S3C64XX_SPI_INT_RX_UNDERRUN_EN (1<<4)
@@ -712,14 +707,15 @@ static int s3c64xx_spi_transfer_one_message(struct
spi_master *master,
enable_cs(sdd, spi);
/* Start the signals */
- S3C64XX_SPI_ACT(sdd);
+ writel(0, sdd->regs + S3C64XX_SPI_SLAVE_SEL);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sdd->lock, flags);
status = wait_for_xfer(sdd, xfer, use_dma);
/* Quiese the signals */
- S3C64XX_SPI_DEACT(sdd);
+ writel(S3C64XX_SPI_SLAVE_SIG_INACT,
+ sdd->regs + S3C64XX_SPI_SLAVE_SEL);
if (status) {
dev_err(&spi->dev, "I/O Error: "
@@ -923,7 +919,7 @@ static void s3c64xx_spi_hwinit(struct
s3c64xx_spi_driver_data *sdd, int channel)
sdd->cur_speed = 0;
- S3C64XX_SPI_DEACT(sdd);
+ writel(S3C64XX_SPI_SLAVE_SIG_INACT, sdd->regs + S3C64XX_SPI_SLAVE_SEL);
/* Disable Interrupts - we use Polling if not DMA mode */
writel(0, regs + S3C64XX_SPI_INT_EN);
--
1.7.10
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
