On 6 September 2012 15:43, Tomasz Figa <t.f...@samsung.com> wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
> On Thursday 06 of September 2012 14:53:01 Thomas Abraham wrote:
>>               compatible = "samsung,s3c2440-i2c";
>>               reg = <0x13860000 0x100>;
>>               interrupts = <0 58 0>;
>> +             pinctrl-names = "default";
>> +             pinctrl-0 = <&i2c0_bus>;
> If pinctrl-names property is omitted then the state index is used as a name
> (e.g. pinctrl-0 would be named "0"). Maybe it would be better to use this
> approach (with respective adjustment in first patch)? What do you think?

I tend to prefer to name the states because it is easier to
cross-reference code and dts files. i2c was a simple one, but for mmc
controllers, there will 1-bit state, 4-bit state and 8-bit state, and
it will be nicer to name then accordingly. So I prefer to use names
but if there is wider consensus on not using names, we can drop names.


> Best regards,
> --
> Tomasz Figa
> Samsung Poland R&D Center
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to