Hi,

On Wed, Sep 19 2012, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> We could just check if the regulator provides the capability to change the 
> voltage.
>
> I don't see any direct way of querying the regulator for provided 
> capabilities (correct me if I'm just blind), but calling 
> regulator_count_voltages() on the regulator and checking if the returned 
> value is 1 should be enough to assume that the regulator is fixed.

Sounds good, I agree.  Are you able to test that the obvious patch below
works on your fixed-regulator board?

Jaehoon and Adrian, can you think of any reason why we shouldn't replace
MMC_CAP2_BROKEN_VOLTAGE with the regulator_count_voltages() call below?
Thanks.


diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/core.c b/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
index 044cd01..a3cc740 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
@@ -1132,7 +1132,7 @@ int mmc_regulator_set_ocr(struct mmc_host *mmc,
                 */
                voltage = regulator_get_voltage(supply);
 
-               if (mmc->caps2 & MMC_CAP2_BROKEN_VOLTAGE)
+               if (regulator_count_voltages(supply) == 1)
                        min_uV = max_uV = voltage;
 
                if (voltage < 0)

-- 
Chris Ball   <c...@laptop.org>   <http://printf.net/>
One Laptop Per Child
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to