Hi, On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 4:42 PM, Jingoo Han <jg1....@samsung.com> wrote: > On Tuesday, October 09, 2012 7:51 PM Vivek Gautam wrote >> >> Hi Kishon, >> >> Firstly, thanks for the quick review. >> >> On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 11:03 AM, kishon <kis...@ti.com> wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > >> > On Monday 08 October 2012 07:42 PM, Vivek Gautam wrote: >> >> >> >> It adds 'type' argument to pmu_isolation function, aligning >> >> with other platforms, which keeps track of usbphy_type. >> >> >> >> Signed-off-by: Vivek Gautam <gautam.vi...@samsung.com> >> >> --- >> >> arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/setup-usb-phy.c | 2 +- >> >> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) >> >> >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/setup-usb-phy.c >> >> b/arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/setup-usb-phy.c >> >> index 3aee778..b7d1d95 100644 >> >> --- a/arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/setup-usb-phy.c >> >> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/setup-usb-phy.c >> >> @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ >> >> #include <mach/map.h> >> >> #include <mach/regs-sys.h> >> >> >> >> -void s5p_usb_phy_pmu_isolation(int on) >> >> +void s5p_usb_phy_pmu_isolation(int on, int type) >> > >> > >> > IMO, this patch should have been squashed with the previous patch. IIUC, >> > you >> > have changed the call to this function for taking two arguments in your >> > previous patch. Wouldn't that introduce compilation break after applying >> > your first patch? >> Yes, that's right it will introduce compilation break, my fault. >> Just one querry, will it be good to put this arch change in [patch 1/5]? >> and then can i move similar change in [patch 3/5] as given below again >> in [patch 1/5]? > > In my opinion, it would be better. > This is because it can prevent build errors. > Sure, I shall update this in the next patchset. > > Best regards, > Jingoo Han > >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/setup-usb-phy.c >> b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/setup-usb-phy.c >> index 1c62d20..039d246 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/setup-usb-phy.c >> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/setup-usb-phy.c >> @@ -222,15 +226,40 @@ int s5p_usb_phy_exit(struct platform_device >> *pdev, int type) >> return -EINVAL; >> } >> >> -void s5p_usb_phy_pmu_isolation(int on) >> +void s5p_usb_phy_pmu_isolation(int on, int type) >> >> > >> > Thanks >> > Kishon >> > >> > -- >> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in >> > the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org >> > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >> >> Best regards >> Vivek >
Thanks Vivek -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
