Am Montag, 26. November 2012, 10:23:17 schrieb Alexander Varnin:
> Is it ok, to send only one last patch after changes, without the one,
> who make macro?
I'd think so, as this series isn't this big. Just include a version into the
patch subject, i.e.
[PATCH v2 2/2] ARM: S3C2443: Workaround for 2443 EXTINT error
to denote the most recent version and include a short summary of the changes
_after_ the "---" of the main commit message.
> 26.11.2012 13:12, Heiko Stübner пишет:
> > Hi Alexander,
> >
> > I think this patch needs a bit more love :-) .
> >
> > Please run scripts/checkpatch.pl on it and fix all the reported problems.
> >
> > And I'd change the comment to something like:
> >
> > /*
> >
> > * S3C2443 CPU has a problem with EXTINTn registers.
> > * Essentially register-reads return transformed data, but the write
> > * is done according to the datasheet.
> > *
> > * Fix this by transforming the read data to the correct format.
> > *
> > * For details refer to the document "S3C2443 GUIDE TO EXTRA GPIO"
> > */
> >
> > Especially the mail address does not need to be in the code - the git
> > history preserves the committer identity quite well.
> >
> >
> > Heiko
> >
> > Am Montag, 26. November 2012, 09:44:41 schrieb Alexander Varnin:
> >> S3C2443 CPU has a problem with incorrect reading from EXTINTn
> >> registers. So s3c_irqext_type function wrongly modifies them.
> >> So add special check to s3c_irqext_type, to handle this case.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Alexander Varnin <fenix...@mail.ru>
> >> ---
> >>
> >> arch/arm/plat-s3c24xx/irq.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >> 1 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-s3c24xx/irq.c b/arch/arm/plat-s3c24xx/irq.c
> >> index fe57bbb..ed19996 100644
> >> --- a/arch/arm/plat-s3c24xx/irq.c
> >> +++ b/arch/arm/plat-s3c24xx/irq.c
> >> @@ -219,6 +219,32 @@ s3c_irqext_type(struct irq_data *data, unsigned int
> >> type) }
> >>
> >> value = __raw_readl(extint_reg);
> >>
> >> +
> >> + /*
> >> + * S3C2443 CPU has a problem with EXTINTn registers.
> >> + * Essentially register-reads returned transformed data, but the write
> >> + * is done according to the datasheet.
> >> + *
> >> + * There is hack introduced for 2443 error workaround.
> >> + *
> >> + * For detais refer to the document "S3C2443 GUIDE TO EXTRA GPIO"
found
> >> on the web. + *
> >> + * A. Varnin <fenix...@mail.ru>
> >> + */
> >> + if(soc_is_s3c2443())
> >> + {
> >> + int i;
> >> + int fixed = 0;
> >> + if(extint_reg == S3C24XX_EXTINT1 || extint_reg ==
S3C24XX_EXTINT2)
> >> + for(i=0; i<7;i++)
> >> + fixed |= (((value >> ((7-i)*4+1)) & 7) |
> >> ((value >> ((7-
> >
> > i)*4-3)) &
> >
> >> 8)) << i*4; + else
> >> + for(i=0; i<7;i++)
> >> + fixed |= ( (value >> (7-i)*4) & 0xf ) << i*4;
> >> + fixed |= (((value>>1) & 7) | ((value<<3) & 8)) << 27;
> >> + value = fixed;
> >> + }
> >> +
> >>
> >> value = (value & ~(7 << extint_offset)) | (newvalue <<
> >> extint_offset); __raw_writel(value, extint_reg);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
