Am Montag, 26. November 2012, 10:43:21 schrieb Alexander Varnin:
> S3C2443 CPU has a problem with incorrect reading from EXTINTn
> registers. So s3c_irqext_type function wrongly modifies them.
> So add special check to s3c_irqext_type, to handle this case.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Varnin <fenix...@mail.ru>
Acked-by: Heiko Stuebner <he...@sntech.de>
> ---
> styling and comment fixes
> arch/arm/plat-s3c24xx/irq.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-s3c24xx/irq.c b/arch/arm/plat-s3c24xx/irq.c
> index fe57bbb..b05c573 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/plat-s3c24xx/irq.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/plat-s3c24xx/irq.c
> @@ -219,6 +219,31 @@ s3c_irqext_type(struct irq_data *data, unsigned int
> type) }
>
> value = __raw_readl(extint_reg);
> +
> + /*
> + * S3C2443 CPU has a problem with EXTINTn registers.
> + * Essentially register-reads return transformed data, but the write
> + * is done according to the datasheet.
> + *
> + * Fix this by transforming the read data to the correct format.
> + *
> + * For details refer to the document "S3C2443 GUIDE TO EXTRA GPIO"
> + */
> + if (soc_is_s3c2443()) {
> + int i;
> + int fixed = 0;
> + if (extint_reg == S3C24XX_EXTINT1
> + || extint_reg == S3C24XX_EXTINT2)
> + for (i = 0; i < 7; i++)
> + fixed |= (((value >> ((7-i)*4+1)) & 7)
> + | ((value >> ((7-i)*4-3)) & 8)) << i*4;
> + else
> + for (i = 0; i < 7; i++)
> + fixed |= ((value >> (7-i)*4) & 0xf) << i*4;
> + fixed |= (((value>>1) & 7) | ((value<<3) & 8)) << 27;
> + value = fixed;
> + }
> +
> value = (value & ~(7 << extint_offset)) | (newvalue << extint_offset);
> __raw_writel(value, extint_reg);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
