On 11/28/12 07:11, Olof Johansson wrote:
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 11:53 AM, Doug Anderson<diand...@chromium.org> wrote:
The recent commit "ARM: EXYNOS: add support for EXYNOS5440 SoC" broke
support for exynos5250 because of_machine_is_compatible() was used too
early in the boot process. It also probably meant that the exynos5440
failed to use the proper iotable. Switch to use
of_flat_dt_is_compatible() in both of these cases.
The failure I was seeing in exynos5250 because of this was:
Division by zero in kernel.
[<80015ed4>] (unwind_backtrace+0x0/0xec) from [<8045c7a4>]
(dump_stack+0x20/0x24)
[<8045c7a4>] (dump_stack+0x20/0x24) from [<80012990>] (__div0+0x20/0x28)
[<80012990>] (__div0+0x20/0x28) from [<8021ab04>] (Ldiv0_64+0x8/0x18)
[<8021ab04>] (Ldiv0_64+0x8/0x18) from [<80068560>]
(__clocksource_updatefreq_scale+0x54/0x134)
[<80068560>] (__clocksource_updatefreq_scale+0x54/0x134) from [<8006865c>]
(__clocksource_register_scale+0x1c/0x54)
[<8006865c>] (__clocksource_register_scale+0x1c/0x54) from [<80612a18>]
(exynos_timer_init+0x100/0x1e8)
[<80612a18>] (exynos_timer_init+0x100/0x1e8) from [<8060d184>]
(time_init+0x28/0x38)
[<8060d184>] (time_init+0x28/0x38) from [<8060a754>]
(start_kernel+0x1e0/0x3c8)
[<8060a754>] (start_kernel+0x1e0/0x3c8) from [<40008078>] (0x40008078)
Signed-off-by: Doug Anderson<diand...@chromium.org>
Thanks Doug.
Kukjin, I'll apply this directly on top of the previous branch in
arm-soc, if that's OK with you.
Sure, go ahead with my ack if you want,
Acked-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene....@samsung.com>
Note, actually there was a fix which uses soc_is_exynos5440() in my
local :-) I'm not sure which one is better at this moment, but I'm OK on
this.
Thanks.
Best regards,
Kgene.
--
Kukjin Kim <kgene....@samsung.com>, Senior Engineer,
SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
