Joonyoung Shim wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> On 12/10/2012 10:07 AM, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim <[email protected]>
> > ---
> >   arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.c |    3 ++-
> >   1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.c b/arch/arm/mach-
> exynos/common.c
> > index 0eb3b9a..9ecda37 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.c
> > @@ -684,7 +684,8 @@ void __init exynos5_init_irq(void)
> >      * Theses parameters should be NULL and 0 because EXYNOS4
> >      * uses GIC instead of VIC.
> >      */
> > -   s5p_init_irq(NULL, 0);
> > +   if (!of_machine_is_compatible("samsung,exynos5440"))
> > +           s5p_init_irq(NULL, 0);
> 
> How about remove to call s5p_init_irq() here because All exynos SoCs use
> GIC instead of VIC?
> 

NO, the current s5p_init_irq() is not only for VIC but also Timer which is
used on EXYNOS SoCs, I know the name is strange...

> >     gic_arch_extn.irq_set_wake = s3c_irq_wake;
> >   }

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to