Heiko Stübner wrote: > > Am Freitag, 10. Mai 2013, 02:32:05 schrieb Kukjin Kim: > > Heiko Stübner wrote: > > > The s3c24xx pins follow a similar pattern as the other Samsung SoCs > and > > > can therefore reuse the already introduced infrastructure. > > > > > > The s3c24xx SoCs have one design oddity in that the first 4 external > > > interrupts do not reside in the eint pending register but in the main > > > interrupt controller instead. We solve this by forwarding the external > > > interrupt from the main controller into the irq domain of the pin bank. > > > The masking/acking of these interrupts is handled in the same way. > > > > > > Furthermore the S3C2412/2413 SoCs contain another oddity in that they > > > keep the same 4 eints in the main interrupt controller and eintpend > > > register and requiring ack operations to happen in both. This is > solved > > > by using different compatible properties for the wakeup eint node > which > > > set a property accordingly. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <[email protected]> > > > Reviewed-by: Tomasz Figa <[email protected]> > > > Reviewed-by: Sylwester Nawrocki <[email protected]> > > > Acked-by: Linus Walleij <[email protected]> > > > > Looks good to me. > > > > Linus, if you want me to take into samsung tree, please let me know. > > in v4 Linus said: > > "Are you taking this through the Samsung tree?" > > This would also enable me to put the s3c2416 devicetree support on top of > it > in this cycle, which of course needs the pinctrl driver. > OK, will apply into samsung tree.
Thanks. - Kukjin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
