On 06/08/2013 05:22 PM, Tomasz Figa wrote: > Hi Tushar, > > On Thursday 06 of June 2013 16:32:52 Tushar Behera wrote: >> Cpufreq driver for EXYNOS4210 is not a platform driver, hence it is not >> possible to provide the regulator supply name through DT bindings. >> Since the cpufreq driver requires the regulator to be named as >> 'vdd_arm', the related regulator name should be kept same. >> >> Signed-off-by: Tushar Behera <[email protected]> >> --- >> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210-origen.dts | 2 +- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210-origen.dts >> b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210-origen.dts index bcf8079..bd5f589 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210-origen.dts >> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210-origen.dts >> @@ -192,7 +192,7 @@ >> }; >> >> buck1_reg: BUCK1 { >> - regulator-name = "VDD_ARM_1.2V"; >> + regulator-name = "vdd_arm"; > > Yes, this is the hack I mentioned in my review of > [PATCH 0/2] Clock update for EXYNOS4210-CPUFREQ driver >
We can hold this patch till we get to a conclusion for the above mentioned patch set. > Best regards, > Tomasz > >> regulator-min-microvolt = > <950000>; >> regulator-max-microvolt = > <1350000>; >> regulator-always-on; -- Tushar Behera -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
