On Monday 17 June 2013 16:30:31 Chander Kashyap wrote:
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/exynos5420-clock.txt
> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/exynos5420-clock.txt
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..9bcc4b1
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/exynos5420-clock.txt
> @@ -0,0 +1,201 @@
> +* Samsung Exynos5420 Clock Controller
> +
> +The Exynos5420 clock controller generates and supplies clock to various
> +controllers within the Exynos5420 SoC.
> +
> +Required Properties:
> +
> +- comptible: should be one of the following.
> + - "samsung,exynos5420-clock" - controller compatible with Exynos5420 SoC.
> +
> +- reg: physical base address of the controller and length of memory mapped
> + region.
> +
> +- #clock-cells: should be 1.
> +
> +The following is the list of clocks generated by the controller. Each clock
> is
> +assigned an identifier and client nodes use this identifier to specify the
> +clock which they consume.
> +
> +
> + [Core Clocks]
> +
> + Clock ID
> + ----------------------------
> +
> + fin_pll 1
> +
> + [Clock Gate for Special Clocks]
> +
> + Clock ID
> + ----------------------------
> + sclk_uart0 128
> + sclk_uart1 129
> + sclk_uart2 130
> +
> + [Peripheral Clock Gates]
> +
> + Clock ID
> + ----------------------------
> +
> + aclk66_peric 256
> + uart0 257
> + uart1 258
It looks like these are actually separate things. Wouldn't it be more sensible
to have separate device nodes for each of the lists and use a local index?
What numbers are used in the data sheet?
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
