On 06/25/13 20:19, Tomasz Figa wrote:
[...]
/*
* PWM block is shared between pwm-samsung and samsung_pwm_timer
drivers
* and some registers need access synchronization. If both drivers
are
* compiled in, the spinlock is defined in the clocksource driver,
* otherwise following definition is used.
*
* Currently we do not need any more complex synchronization method
* because all the supported SoCs contain only one instance of the
PWM
* IP. Should this change, both drivers will need to be modified to
* properly synchronize accesses to particular instances.
*/
I see that you can't be persuaded. And everybody else seems to be
okay
with it so... have it your way. I'm probably going to regret this.
This was just a proposal. Do you want anything else to be added to the
comment or anything to be changed?
For reference, I still don't like this but since I'm the only one
complaining, go ahead. With that comment added to the driver:
Acked-by: Thierry Reding<[email protected]>
OK. Thank you.
Kukjin, can you amend the comment I mentioned to this patch above the line
with DEFINE_SPINLOCK or I should send fixed version?
Tomasz, please re-send this one with fixing it but I'm not sure this can
be sent for upcoming merge window because it's a little bit late.
Anyway, let me try it.
Thanks,
- Kukjin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
