On 8 August 2013 04:55, Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]> wrote:
> It looks like it would require us to redefine .target() to take next_state
> instead of target_freq (at least in the acpi-cpufreq case), wouldn't it?

If we don't do it, then atleast for few drivers, like acpi-cpufreq, which
use index more than just for frequency, we may end up calling
cpufreq_frequency_table_target() twice. Once in the core and then
in driver.

I believe this is doable and will post a patch soon.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to