Hi Yuvaraj,

On Wednesday 28 of August 2013 17:33:06 Yuvaraj Kumar C D wrote:
> This patch adds the device tree node entries for exynos5420 SOC.
> Exynos5420 has a different version of DWMMC controller,so a new
> compatible string is used to distinguish it from the prior SOC's.
> 
> This patch depends on
>       mmc: dw_mmc: exynos: Add a new compatible string for exynos5420
> 
> changes since v4:
>       1.Droppped the bypass-smu binding property.
>       2.Used compatible string "samsung,exynos5250-dw-mshc"
>         for controller instance which does not have SMU.
> 
> changes since V3:
>       1.change fifo-depth size from 0x80 to 0x40
>       2.Move the below properties
>               a.card-detect-delay
>               b.samsung,dw-mshc-ciu-div
>               c.samsung,dw-mshc-sdr-timing
>               d.samsung,dw-mshc-ddr-timing
>       from SOC dts to board dts file as suggested by Doug Anderson
> 
> changes since V2:
>       1.dropped num-slots property from node as its not required
>         if number of card slots available is 1.
> 
>       2.Move the below properties
>               a.fifo-depth
>               b.card-detect-delay
>               c.samsung,dw-mshc-ciu-div
>               d.samsung,dw-mshc-sdr-timing
>               e.samsung,dw-mshc-ddr-timing
>       from board dts to SOC dts,as these are not board specific properties.
> 
>       3.Updated the binding document exynos-dw-mshc.txt.
> 
> changes since V1:
>       1.disable node by status = disabled in SOC file
>       2.enable node by status = okay in board specific file
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yuvaraj Kumar C D <[email protected]>
> ---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/mmc/exynos-dw-mshc.txt     |    2 +
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420-smdk5420.dts          |   33
> +++++++++++++++++ arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi                  |  
> 39 ++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 74 insertions(+)

This patch looks good to me now, except some minor comments below.

> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/exynos-dw-mshc.txt
> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/exynos-dw-mshc.txt index
> 6d1c098..84cd56f 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/exynos-dw-mshc.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/exynos-dw-mshc.txt
> @@ -16,6 +16,8 @@ Required Properties:
>         specific extensions.
>       - "samsung,exynos5250-dw-mshc": for controllers with Samsung Exynos5250
> specific extensions.
> +     - "samsung,exynos5420-dw-mshc": for controllers with Samsung Exynos5420
> +       specific extensions.
> 
>  * samsung,dw-mshc-ciu-div: Specifies the divider value for the card
> interface unit (ciu) clock. This property is applicable only for Exynos5
> SoC's and diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420-smdk5420.dts
> b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420-smdk5420.dts index bafba25..3ce5c97
> 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420-smdk5420.dts
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420-smdk5420.dts
> @@ -31,6 +31,39 @@
>               };
>       };
> 
> +     dwmmc0@12200000 {

Node name should not contain instance index. Instead, according to ePAPR 
recommendation, I would opt for a generic name such as mmc, mshc or sdio-
host. mshc is already used on Exynos 4 so it might be a good idea to use it 
for consistency.

[Adding DT maintainers on CC]

Best regards,
Tomasz

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to