Hi, On 24/09/13 14:50, Mateusz Krawczuk wrote: > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/samsung,s5pv210-clock.txt > @@ -0,0 +1,75 @@ > +* Samsung S5PC110/S5PV210 Clock Controller > + > +The S5PV210 clock controller generates and supplies clock to various > controllers > +within the SoC. The clock binding described here is applicable to all SoCs in > +the S5PC110/S5PV210 family. > + > +Required Properties: > + > +- compatible: should be "samsung,s5pv210-clock".
I have nothing against this compatible value, but wouldn't it be more accurate to use, e.g. "samsung,s5pv210-cmu" - for Clock Management Unit, as this IP block is also referred to in the documentation ? May just be me, but "samsung,s5pv210-clock" sounds like just one specific clock type. -- Thanks, Sylwester -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
