On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 7:39 PM, Alex Williamson
<alex.william...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2013-09-30 at 17:28 +0200, Antonios Motakis wrote:
> > This is a workaround to make the VFIO_IOMMU_TYPE1 driver usable with
> > platform devices instead of PCI. A future permanent fix should support
> > both. This is required in order to use the Exynos SMMU, or ARM SMMU
> > driver with VFIO.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Antonios Motakis <a.mota...@virtualopensystems.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/vfio/Kconfig            |  2 +-
> >  drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++----
> >  2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/vfio/Kconfig b/drivers/vfio/Kconfig
> > index 7cd5dec..1f84eda 100644
> > --- a/drivers/vfio/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/vfio/Kconfig
> > @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ config VFIO_IOMMU_TYPE1
> >  menuconfig VFIO
> >       tristate "VFIO Non-Privileged userspace driver framework"
> >       depends on IOMMU_API
> > -     select VFIO_IOMMU_TYPE1 if X86
> > +     select VFIO_IOMMU_TYPE1 if X86 || ARM
> >       help
> >         VFIO provides a framework for secure userspace device drivers.
> >         See Documentation/vfio.txt for more details.
> > diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c 
> > b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
> > index 6f3fbc4..d7e6a12 100644
> > --- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
> > +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
> > @@ -30,7 +30,8 @@
> >  #include <linux/iommu.h>
> >  #include <linux/module.h>
> >  #include <linux/mm.h>
> > -#include <linux/pci.h>               /* pci_bus_type */
> > +#include <linux/pci.h>                       /* pci_bus_type */
> > +#include <linux/platform_device.h>   /* platform_bus_type */
> >  #include <linux/sched.h>
> >  #include <linux/slab.h>
> >  #include <linux/uaccess.h>
> > @@ -46,6 +47,8 @@ module_param_named(allow_unsafe_interrupts,
> >                  allow_unsafe_interrupts, bool, S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR);
> >  MODULE_PARM_DESC(allow_unsafe_interrupts,
> >                "Enable VFIO IOMMU support for on platforms without 
> > interrupt remapping support.");
> > +static struct bus_type *iommu_bus_type = NULL;
> > +static bool require_cap_intr_remap = false;
> >
> >  struct vfio_iommu {
> >       struct iommu_domain     *domain;
> > @@ -612,7 +615,8 @@ static void *vfio_iommu_type1_open(unsigned long arg)
> >       /*
> >        * Wish we didn't have to know about bus_type here.
> >        */
> > -     iommu->domain = iommu_domain_alloc(&pci_bus_type);
> > +     iommu->domain = iommu_domain_alloc(iommu_bus_type);
> > +
> >       if (!iommu->domain) {
> >               kfree(iommu);
> >               return ERR_PTR(-EIO);
> > @@ -624,7 +628,7 @@ static void *vfio_iommu_type1_open(unsigned long arg)
> >        * the way.  Fortunately we know interrupt remapping is global for
> >        * our iommus.
> >        */
> > -     if (!allow_unsafe_interrupts &&
> > +     if (require_cap_intr_remap && !allow_unsafe_interrupts &&
> >           !iommu_domain_has_cap(iommu->domain, IOMMU_CAP_INTR_REMAP)) {
> >               pr_warn("%s: No interrupt remapping support.  Use the module 
> > param \"allow_unsafe_interrupts\" to enable VFIO IOMMU support on this 
> > platform\n",
> >                      __func__);
> > @@ -733,7 +737,17 @@ static const struct vfio_iommu_driver_ops 
> > vfio_iommu_driver_ops_type1 = {
> >
> >  static int __init vfio_iommu_type1_init(void)
> >  {
> > -     if (!iommu_present(&pci_bus_type))
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_PCI
> > +     if (iommu_present(&pci_bus_type)) {
> > +             iommu_bus_type = &pci_bus_type;
> > +             /* For PCI targets, IOMMU_CAP_INTR_REMAP is required */
> > +             require_cap_intr_remap = true;
> > +     }
> > +#endif
> > +     if (!iommu_bus_type && iommu_present(&platform_bus_type))
> > +             iommu_bus_type = &platform_bus_type;
> > +
> > +     if(!iommu_bus_type)
> >               return -ENODEV;
> >
> >       return vfio_register_iommu_driver(&vfio_iommu_driver_ops_type1);
>
> Is it possible to have a system with both PCI and platform devices?  How
> would you support that?  Thanks,
>
> Alex
>

It looks like it would take more work to support IOMMUs on both at the
same time, esp. since we need to know the right bus type.

However, I don't know of a system with an IOMMU on both PCI and a
platform bus. A better solution might be found before we can talk
about upstreaming, of course.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to