On 24 February 2014 05:51, Kukjin Kim <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 12/27/13 19:38, Sachin Kamat wrote:
>>
>> CONFIG_MACH_EXYNOS4_DT does not exist. Use ARCH_EXYNOS4 instead.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat<[email protected]>
>> ---
>>   arch/arm/configs/exynos_defconfig |    2 +-
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/configs/exynos_defconfig
>> b/arch/arm/configs/exynos_defconfig
>> index dbe1f1c47bb0..dff01ecf78cc 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/configs/exynos_defconfig
>> +++ b/arch/arm/configs/exynos_defconfig
>> @@ -10,8 +10,8 @@ CONFIG_PARTITION_ADVANCED=y
>>   CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS=y
>>   CONFIG_S3C_LOWLEVEL_UART_PORT=3
>>   CONFIG_S3C24XX_PWM=y
>> +CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS4=y
>>   CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS5=y
>> -CONFIG_MACH_EXYNOS4_DT=y
>>   CONFIG_SMP=y
>>   CONFIG_NR_CPUS=8
>>   CONFIG_PREEMPT=y
>
>
> Well, this is not required because it should be fine without this change.
> ARCH_EXYNOS4 will be selected when ARCH_EXYNOS is enabled and non-exist
> CONFIG (MACH_EXYNOS4_DT) will be ignored.

Functionally this might not be needed as Exynos4 is selected by
default. However, I don't see
any point in retaining non-existent symbols.

-- 
With warm regards,
Sachin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to