On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 12:24:31PM +0200, Heiko Stübner wrote: > +choice > + prompt "S3C24XX low-level debugging port type" > + depends on DEBUG_LL && ARCH_S3C24XX > + > + config DEBUG_S3C24XX_UART_S3C2440 > + bool "S3C2440 uart type" > + help > + Select this if you're debugging S3C2416, S3C2440, S3C2442, > + S3C2443 or S3C2450 SoCs. > + > + config DEBUG_S3C24XX_UART_S3C2410 > + bool "S3C2410 uart type" > + help > + Select this if you're debugging S3C2410 or S3C2412 SoCs. > +endchoice
Why does this need to be a separate choice statement? What's special about S3C24XX? Is there something wrong with the main choice statement just above this where everyone else lists their debugging UART? -- FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: now at 9.7Mbps down 460kbps up... slowly improving, and getting towards what was expected from it. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
