On 04/25/2014 11:13 AM, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 04/25/2014 01:30 PM, Tushar Behera wrote:
>> On 04/25/2014 06:46 AM, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
>>> This patch fix the offset of CPU boot address and don't need to send smc
>>> call
>>> of SMC_CMD_CPU1BOOT command for secondary CPU boot because Exynos3250
>>> removes
>>> WFE in secure mode.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.c...@samsung.com>
>>> Acked-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.p...@samsung.com>
>>> ---
>>> arch/arm/mach-exynos/firmware.c | 10 ++++++++--
>>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/firmware.c
>>> b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/firmware.c
>>> index aa01c42..386d01d 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/firmware.c
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/firmware.c
>>> @@ -31,11 +31,17 @@ static int exynos_do_idle(void)
>>> static int exynos_cpu_boot(int cpu)
>>> {
>>> /*
>>> + * Exynos3250 doesn't need to send smc command for secondary CPU boot
>>> + * because Exynos3250 removes WFE in secure mode.
>>> + */
>>> + if (soc_is_exynos3250())
>>> + return 0;
>>> + /*
>>> * The second parameter of SMC_CMD_CPU1BOOT command means CPU id.
>>> * But, Exynos4212 has only one secondary CPU so second parameter
>>> * isn't used for informing secure firmware about CPU id.
>>> */
>>> - if (soc_is_exynos4212())
>>> + else if (soc_is_exynos4212())
>>
>> This changes is not required.
>
> Do you mean it as following?
>
> if (soc_is_exynos3250())
> return 0
>
> if (soc_is_exynos4212())
> cpu = 0;
>
Yes, logically the flow would be same and code would be more readable.
>>
>>> cpu = 0;
>>>
>>> exynos_smc(SMC_CMD_CPU1BOOT, cpu, 0, 0);
>>> @@ -46,7 +52,7 @@ static int exynos_set_cpu_boot_addr(int cpu, unsigned
>>> long boot_addr)
>>> {
>>> void __iomem *boot_reg = S5P_VA_SYSRAM_NS + 0x1c;
>>>
>>> - if (!soc_is_exynos4212())
>>> + if (!soc_is_exynos4212() && !soc_is_exynos3250())
>>> boot_reg += 4*cpu;
>>>
>>> __raw_writel(boot_addr, boot_reg);
>>>
>>
>>
>
--
Tushar Behera
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
