Hi Arun,
On 02.05.2014 15:03, Arun Kumar K wrote:
Adds support for google peach-pi board having the
Exynos5800 SoC.
Signed-off-by: Arun Kumar K <arun...@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Doug Anderson <diand...@chromium.org>
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile | 3 +-
arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5800-peach-pi.dts | 144 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 146 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5800-peach-pi.dts
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile b/arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile
index 35c146f..efe1573 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile
@@ -76,7 +76,8 @@ dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS) += exynos4210-origen.dtb \
exynos5420-arndale-octa.dtb \
exynos5420-smdk5420.dtb \
exynos5440-sd5v1.dtb \
- exynos5440-ssdk5440.dtb
+ exynos5440-ssdk5440.dtb \
+ exynos5800-peach-pi.dtb
dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_HI3xxx) += hi3620-hi4511.dtb
dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_HIGHBANK) += highbank.dtb \
ecx-2000.dtb
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5800-peach-pi.dts
b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5800-peach-pi.dts
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..e0f8633
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5800-peach-pi.dts
@@ -0,0 +1,144 @@
+/*
+ * Google Peach Pi Rev 10+ board device tree source
+ *
+ * Copyright (c) 2014 Google, Inc
+ *
+ * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
+ * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
+ * published by the Free Software Foundation.
+ */
+
+/dts-v1/;
+#include <dt-bindings/input/input.h>
+#include <dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h>
+#include "exynos5800.dtsi"
+
+/ {
+ model = "Google Peach Pi Rev 10+";
+
+ compatible = "google,pi-rev16",
+ "google,pi-rev15", "google,pi-rev14",
+ "google,pi-rev13", "google,pi-rev12",
+ "google,pi-rev11", "google,pi-rev10",
+ "google,pi", "google,peach", "samsung,exynos5800",
+ "samsung,exynos5";
I can see this board using the "google,peach" compatible string, which
is the same as one listed for peach-pit board. Since they are based on
different SoCs, are they really compatible?
+
+ memory {
+ reg = <0 0>;
I don't think this is a good idea, because this is basically rendering
this dts file useless, unless used with a bootloader that can actually
inject correct values. I believe that some generic setup could be
provided in the dts, so you could at least get the board running.
Otherwise looks good, so after addressing the two comments above feel
free to add my Reviewed-by.
Best regards,
Tomasz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
