Hi Doug,

On 17 June 2014 21:22, Doug Anderson <diand...@chromium.org> wrote:
>
> Simon,
>
> On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 8:39 PM, Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> wrote:
> > Hi Doug,
> >
> > On 16 June 2014 14:39, Doug Anderson <diand...@chromium.org> wrote:
> >> From: Bill Richardson <wfric...@chromium.org>
> >>
> >> struct cros_ec_device has a superfluous "name" field. We can get all the
> >> debugging info we need from the existing ec_name and phys_name fields, so
> >> let's take out the extra field.
> >
> > Except that it no longer prints I2C/SPI - i.e. the transport that is
> > used. Is that not considered important?
>
> Before this change:
>   [    1.895472] cros-ec-spi spi2.0: Chrome EC (SPI)
>
> After this change:
>   [    1.910671] cros-ec-spi spi2.0: Chrome EC device registered
>
>
> I think having SPI in the name twice is probably enough.  ;)

Ah that helps! Could have been in the commit message.

Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org>

Regards,
Simon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to