Jaehoon, On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 7:29 PM, Jaehoon Chung <jh80.ch...@samsung.com> wrote: > Replaced the "disable-wp" into host's quirks. > (Because the slot-node is removed at dt-file.) > > Signed-off-by: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.ch...@samsung.com> > Tested-by: Sachin Kamat <sachin.ka...@samsung.com> > Acked-by: Seungwon Jeon <tgih....@samsung.com> > --- > drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c | 12 +++++------- > include/linux/mmc/dw_mmc.h | 6 ++---- > 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c > index 1ac227c..4a4f66f 100644 > --- a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c > +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c > @@ -997,7 +997,7 @@ static int dw_mci_get_ro(struct mmc_host *mmc) > int gpio_ro = mmc_gpio_get_ro(mmc); > > /* Use platform get_ro function, else try on board write protect */ > - if (slot->quirks & DW_MCI_SLOT_QUIRK_NO_WRITE_PROTECT) > + if (slot->host->quirks & DW_MCI_QUIRK_NO_WRITE_PROTECT)
It doesn't seem like it would be hard to include support for the old binding (and just print a warning). Then this could land ahead of the device tree changes. Generally I think we're supposed to keep support for old device trees if possible (except in extreme cases). -Doug -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
