On Thu, 25 Sep 2014, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > Hello Lee, > > On 09/19/2014 02:15 AM, Lee Jones wrote: > >> > >> As explained above, DT, non-DT and x86 platforms instantiate the > >> cros-ec-dev > >> cells but DT platforms can define other child nodes. But I can remove the > >> conditional if you want and reintroduce it once cros-ec-dev support is > >> added. > > > > Yes, that makes sense. I only care about doing what's right for > > Mainline, so if it doesn't make sense here, then we shouldn't be doing > > it. > > > > Understood, that's why I dropped this since as explained earlier, it makes > more > sense to include this change once the cros_ec_dev driver is pushed to > upstream. > > The last version of the series (v4) I posted a week ago [0], does not include > this patch so I hope the series can be picked for 3.18 since most of the > patches > were already acked by you.
Unfortunately this is going to have to wait until v3.19 now, as Linus is closing the -rcs early. I have subsequently applied my last patch to the MFD tree for v3.18. It will be good for these patches to get some soak testing in -next anyway, rather than rush them in. -- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
