On 10/10/2014 01:38 AM, Lukasz Majewski wrote: > Since both SoCs have the same TMU IP block embedded on them, it is > not necessary to maintain separate compatible entry. > > Signed-off-by: Lukasz Majewski <[email protected]> > --- > drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c | 3 --- > 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c > b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c > index f1e8c9b..7818e2f 100644 > --- a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c > +++ b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c > @@ -744,9 +744,6 @@ static irqreturn_t exynos_tmu_irq(int irq, void *id) > > static const struct of_device_id exynos_tmu_match[] = { > { > - .compatible = "samsung,exynos3250-tmu", > - }, > - {
If you want to remove compatible string for Exynos3250, you have to modify it on exynos3250.dtsi. Thanks, Chanwoo Choi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
