On 22/12/14 12:46, Tony K Nadackal wrote: >>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/exynos7-clock.txt >>> > > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/exynos7-clock.txt >>> > > index 6d3d5f8..d0e048c 100644 >>> > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/exynos7-clock.txt >>> > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/exynos7-clock.txt >>> > > @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ Required Properties for Clock Controller: >>> > > - "samsung,exynos7-clock-peris" >>> > > - "samsung,exynos7-clock-fsys0" >>> > > - "samsung,exynos7-clock-fsys1" >>> > > + - "samsung,exynos7-clock-mscl" >> > >> > I can't see anything controversial in the patch, but I've got some doubts >> > regarding the compatible string. Is there a SoC named just "Exynos7"? > > Yes, We have an SoC named Exynos7. > Please refer http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-samsung-soc/msg36765.html
I've queued this patch for 3.20. Would be nice to have a Reviewed-by tag from someone else who has access to the SoC documentation though. Is Exynos7420 User Manual applicable to this? Exynos 7 (Octa?) seems like a marketing name to me. In technical documents there are usually more specific names used, like exynos7410 or exynos7420. -- Regards, Sylwester -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
