On 05/02/15 08:44, Pankaj Dubey wrote:
>> +static struct samsung_gate_clock apollo_gate_clks[] __initdata = {
>> > +
>> > + /* ENABLE_PCLK_APOLLO */
>> > + GATE(CLK_PCLK_ASAPBMST_CSSYS_APOLLO, "pclk_asapbmst_cssys_apollo",
>> > + "div_pclk_dbg_apollo", ENABLE_PCLK_APOLLO,
>> > + 2, CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED, 0),
>> > + GATE(CLK_PCLK_PMU_APOLLO, "pclk_pmu_apollo", "div_pclk_apollo",
>> > + ENABLE_PCLK_APOLLO, 1, CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED, 0),
>> > + GATE(CLK_PCLK_SYSREG_APOLLO, "pclk_pmu_sysreg_apollo",
>
> Isn't "pclk_pmu_sysreg_apollo" be named as "pclk_sysreg_apollo" to match
> with UM?
Sounds reasonable, Chanwoo, if you agree I'll squash following change
to this patch before sending upstream:
diff --git a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5433.c
b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5433.c
index 7a024cd..387e3e3 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5433.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5433.c
@@ -3656,7 +3656,7 @@ static struct samsung_gate_clock apollo_gate_clks[]
__initdata = {
2, CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED, 0),
GATE(CLK_PCLK_PMU_APOLLO, "pclk_pmu_apollo", "div_pclk_apollo",
ENABLE_PCLK_APOLLO, 1, CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED, 0),
- GATE(CLK_PCLK_SYSREG_APOLLO, "pclk_pmu_sysreg_apollo",
+ GATE(CLK_PCLK_SYSREG_APOLLO, "pclk_sysreg_apollo",
"div_pclk_apollo", ENABLE_PCLK_APOLLO,
0, CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED, 0),
--
Thanks,
Sylwester
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
