On 2015-05-22 11:12, Joonyoung Shim wrote:
On 05/06/2015 10:36 PM, Tobias Jakobi wrote:
First step in allowing a more generic way to setup complex
blending for the different layers.

Signed-off-by: Tobias Jakobi <[email protected]>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_mixer.c | 90 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 79 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_mixer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_mixer.c
index 4a1656b..e4a5e76 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_mixer.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_mixer.c
@@ -63,6 +63,11 @@ struct mixer_resources {
        struct clk              *mout_mixer;
 };

+struct layer_config {
+       unsigned int index;
+       unsigned int priority;

I think layer index and priority information can go to struct
exynos_drm_plane.

+};
+
 enum mixer_version_id {
        MXR_VER_0_0_0_16,
        MXR_VER_16_0_33_0,
@@ -75,6 +80,8 @@ struct mixer_context {
        struct drm_device       *drm_dev;
        struct exynos_drm_crtc  *crtc;
        struct exynos_drm_plane planes[MIXER_WIN_NR];
+       const struct layer_config *layer_config;
+       unsigned int num_layer;
        int                     pipe;
        bool                    interlace;
        bool                    powered;
@@ -95,6 +102,40 @@ struct mixer_drv_data {
        bool                                    has_sclk;
 };

+/*
+ * The default layer priorities. A higher priority means that
+ * the layer is at the top of layer stack.
+ * The current configuration assumes the following usage scenario:
+ * layer1: OSD [top]
+ * layer0: main framebuffer
+ * video layer: video overlay [bottom]
+ * Note that the video layer is only usable when the
+ * video processor is available.
+ */
+
+static const struct layer_config default_layer_config[] = {
+       {
+               .index = 0,                     /* layer0 */
+               .priority = 1
+       }, {
+               .index = 1,                     /* layer1 */
+               .priority = 2
+       }
+};
+
+static const struct layer_config vp_layer_config[] = {
+       {
+               .index = 2,                     /* video layer */
+               .priority = 1
+       }, {
+               .index = 0,                     /* layer0 */
+               .priority = 2
+       }, {
+               .index = 1,                     /* layer1 */
+               .priority = 3
+       }
+};
+

I feel there is no reason to split config, actually video layer exists
and video layer isn't enabled if no vp even if we use 3 layer.
Maybe I should add this here. Both default_layer_config and vp_layer_config function as default layer configurations. My plan is to expose custom configuration through a exynosdrm module parameter. The zpos property is immutable, so we can't modify it anymore after mixer probing (I understand that the immutabilility is a requirement of atomic). But we still can allow the user to supply his configuraton through the module parameter approach.


With best wishes,
Tobias

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to