On 04/06/15 01:05, Michael Turquette wrote: > One small thing: clk-next isn't considered stable. I had some stuff in > there (Stephen's amba assigned-clock-rates patch) which I had to pull > out (no ACK from maintainer) and it crept back in because this PR was > based on top of it. No big deal because I caught it when it happened > (this time). > > In the future I am always happy to take PRs based on -rc1 (or any -rc > that is already present in clk-next). Of course if you have a dependency > on stuff already merged in clk-next then just let me know.
All right, sorry for the trouble. I'll keep that in mind and will use stable tags for future pull request. -- Thanks, Sylwester -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
