From: Shailendra Verma <[email protected]> During probe free the memory allocated to "exynos_info" in case of unknown SoC type.
Signed-off-by: Shailendra Verma <[email protected]> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <[email protected]> Acked-by: Lukasz Majewski <[email protected]> [k.kozlowski: Rebased the patch around if(of_machine_is_compatible)] Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim <[email protected]> --- Hi Rafael and Viresh, Since this is a fix to prevent memory leak, it would be better if this could be sent to linus during -rc via cpufreq tree. Thanks, Kukjin drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c | 6 ++++-- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c index ae5b2bd..fa3dd84 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c @@ -180,7 +180,7 @@ static int exynos_cpufreq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) ret = exynos5250_cpufreq_init(exynos_info); } else { pr_err("%s: Unknown SoC type\n", __func__); - return -ENODEV; + ret = -ENODEV; } if (ret) @@ -188,12 +188,14 @@ static int exynos_cpufreq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) if (exynos_info->set_freq == NULL) { dev_err(&pdev->dev, "No set_freq function (ERR)\n"); + ret = -EINVAL; goto err_vdd_arm; } arm_regulator = regulator_get(NULL, "vdd_arm"); if (IS_ERR(arm_regulator)) { dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get resource vdd_arm\n"); + ret = -EINVAL; goto err_vdd_arm; } @@ -225,7 +227,7 @@ err_cpufreq_reg: regulator_put(arm_regulator); err_vdd_arm: kfree(exynos_info); - return -EINVAL; + return ret; } static struct platform_driver exynos_cpufreq_platdrv = { -- 2.0.0 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
