Hi Jingoo,

On 08/20/2015 02:49 AM, Jingoo Han wrote:
On 2015. 8. 19., at PM 11:52, Yakir Yang <y...@rock-chips.com> wrote:

What is the reason to make this patch?

Please make commit message including the reason.

Okay, I think the below words would be okay :)

"This change just make a little clean to make code more like
drm core expect, move hdp detect code from bridge->enable(),
and place them into connector->detect()."

Thanks,
- Yakir

Best regards,
Jingoo Han

Signed-off-by: Yakir Yang <y...@rock-chips.com>
---
Changes in v3:
- move dp hpd detect to connector detect function.

Changes in v2: None

drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix_dp_core.c | 12 ++++++------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix_dp_core.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix_dp_core.c
index 75dd44a..052b9b3 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix_dp_core.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix_dp_core.c
@@ -915,12 +915,6 @@ static void analogix_dp_commit(struct analogix_dp_device 
*dp)
            DRM_ERROR("failed to disable the panel\n");
    }

-    ret = analogix_dp_detect_hpd(dp);
-    if (ret) {
-        /* Cable has been disconnected, we're done */
-        return;
-    }
-
    ret = analogix_dp_handle_edid(dp);
    if (ret) {
        dev_err(dp->dev, "unable to handle edid\n");
@@ -953,6 +947,12 @@ static void analogix_dp_commit(struct analogix_dp_device 
*dp)
static enum drm_connector_status analogix_dp_detect(
                struct drm_connector *connector, bool force)
{
+    struct analogix_dp_device *dp = connector_to_dp(connector);
+
+    if (analogix_dp_detect_hpd(dp))
+        /* Cable has been disconnected, we're done */
+        return connector_status_disconnected;
+
    return connector_status_connected;
}

--
1.9.1






--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to