On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 12:28:17PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Since the Emulex driver tracks things by target (actually FC remote port) > rather than luns, having the ability to have driver data space in the > lun didn't help much. Yes, the driver data space could be in the > transport-specific FC remote port, but I thought a more generic solution > would have been prefered - thus the patch request. > > At this point, it appears that consensus is against the need for this, > especially as it can be handled within the only area needed today - that of > the FC transport.
Well, I disagree with that for certain. I know of a handfull of SPI HBA drivers that would benefit from per-target private data. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
