On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 09:06:14AM -0500, Ricky Beam wrote: > On Thu, 10 Feb 2005, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > >The hardware is supported by qla2xxx which is much better (and > >maintained) driver. Keeping the driver around confuses people to > >actually use it with severe results, e.g. > > That's a nice theory, but not so true in practice. qla2xxx will not > correctly drive a 2100. I've complained about this for several years > now and it still doesn't work. QLogic doesn't test the 2100 anymore. > (Maybe not the 2200's either.)
Arjan tested it on the 2100 a while ago and it worked just fine. Have you tested it recently? > qlogicfc was removed from the tree once before only to be put back > about 30sec later because people still use it. It's certainly not > BROKEN. Not recommended, but not broken either. BROKEN is a tag for > things that are _broken_ -- they don't compile and don't work when they > do. qlogicfc both compiles and works, so BROKEN is the wrong thing to > use. It _is_ broken. See the url in my initial post. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
