On Sun, 20 Feb 2005, Matthew Dharm wrote: > > Matt, it looks like the best way to solve this problem is to go back to > > the old strategy of always setting the SCSI revision to 2 (no matter what > > it might actually be), at least for Direct Access devices. That would > > suppress the REPORT_LUNS command. Would we lose anything by doing this? > > Besides the use of REPORT_LUNS on devices which actually support it? I > don't think so...
That doesn't sound like much of a loss, especially since these devices do implement Get_Max_LUN. Or if they don't, I can't believe they would implement REPORT_LUNS either. I'll send in a patch for this soon. Alan Stern - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
