On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 01:56:25PM -0600, Matt Domsch wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 11:47:09AM -0800, Jean Tourrilhes wrote:
> >     Hi,
> > 
> >     What is a reasonable defect list size for an almost new disk
> > (3 weeks - 146 GB).
> >     scscinfo -d gives me :
> > --------------------------------------------
> > Data from Defect Lists
> > ----------------------
> > 3060 entries in manufacturer table.
> > ...
> > [truncated]
> > --------------------------------------------
> >     Which is way more than my older and smaller disk. I'm
> > wondering if this is acceptable or if I have a bad disk.
> 
> 306184192 sectors (give or take a few) on that disk.
>      3060 sectors bad at low-level format time.
> 
> While it may feel like a large number, it really isn't for the size
> disk you've got.
> 
> Now, if the number of "Grown" defects starts increasing, then yes, be
> worried.
> 
> Thanks,
> Matt

        Thanks very much for the quick answer. Yes, as you can see,
I'm used to much smaller disk and looking at all options about my
crashes (see other e-mail).
        Sorry for the trouble.

        Jean

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to