On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 06:03:16PM +1000, Douglas Gilbert wrote:
> >The real problem is that someone decided to export the proc_name in sysfs.
> >It's supposed to be only procfs-specific but someone violated that rule.
> 
> Forget the "proc_" part. It is effectively the lld_name.
> 
> Allowing the LLD to name itself to the scsi subsystem
> makes sense, especially when the LLD is made up of several
> kernel modules. See my previous example comparing the
> output of lsscsi -H and scan_host.sh .

In theory we have ->name for that, but people have decided to put really
verbose stuff in there.  A module name is important, not just for scsi.

James once had a proposal where the scsi_host can link to the module in
sysfs, which is the right thing and needed for other things like mkinitrd
aswell.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to