Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > On Sun, 7 Aug 2005, Mike Christie wrote: > > >>Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: >> >>>Now, it would be best, I think, if somebody could review the patches to >>>dc395x and tmscsim. In case the 2 functions are correct, they could be >>>included in a central file (scsi_lib?) for all drivers, needing PIO (I >> >>would it be possible to modify the scatterwalk code so we can share >>something with other subsystems? > > > Do you have something specific in mind or you just mean drivers, that I > mentioned: IDE and libata? If the latter - don't know. I seem to remember > as somebody described their requirements in the April discussion, they > seemed different enough to me. I am pretty sure IDE was mentioned as also > doing PIO sometimes, not even sure if libata really was also discussed. If > you mean something specific, like iscsi, - what exactly?
Well, iscsi too, but there is the scatterwalk code which the crypto api uses today and looks similar to what ide, libata, and scsi need. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
