On Thu, 2005-09-08 at 16:49 -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> This hasn't been tested very thoroughly, so please look through it 
> carefully.

Actually, just one problem and one cosmetic fix:

1) We need to dequeue for the loop and kill case (it seems easiest
simply to dequeue in the scsi_kill_request() routine)
2) There's no real need to drop the queue lock.  __scsi_done() is lock
agnostic, so since there's no requirement, let's just leave it in to
avoid any locking issues.

Thanks,

James

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
--- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
@@ -1370,7 +1370,8 @@ static void scsi_kill_request(struct req
 {
        struct scsi_cmnd *cmd = req->special;
 
-       spin_unlock(q->queue_lock);
+       blkdev_dequeue_request(req);
+
        if (unlikely(cmd == NULL)) {
                printk(KERN_CRIT "impossible request in %s.\n",
                                 __FUNCTION__);
@@ -1381,7 +1382,6 @@ static void scsi_kill_request(struct req
        cmd->result = DID_NO_CONNECT << 16;
        atomic_inc(&cmd->device->iorequest_cnt);
        __scsi_done(cmd);
-       spin_lock(q->queue_lock);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1432,7 +1432,6 @@ static void scsi_request_fn(struct reque
                if (unlikely(!scsi_device_online(sdev))) {
                        printk(KERN_ERR "scsi%d (%d:%d): rejecting I/O to 
offline device\n",
                               sdev->host->host_no, sdev->id, sdev->lun);
-                       blkdev_dequeue_request(req);
                        scsi_kill_request(req, q);
                        continue;
                }


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to