Am Donnerstag, 12. Juli 2007 schrieb James Bottomley:
> On Thu, 2007-07-12 at 15:29 +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> > Am Donnerstag, 12. Juli 2007 schrieb Boaz Harrosh:
> > >
> > > - use scsi_cmnd data accessors
> > > - Clean the !use_sg code paths
> >
> > This doesn't compile, at least on x86_64, so NAK.
> >
> > Regards
> > Oliver
> >
> > CC [M] drivers/usb/image/microtek.o
> > drivers/usb/image/microtek.c: In function ‘mts_data_done’:
> > drivers/usb/image/microtek.c:450: warning: implicit declaration of function
> > ‘scsi_set_resid’
> > drivers/usb/image/microtek.c: In function ‘mts_command_done’:
> > drivers/usb/image/microtek.c:494: warning: implicit declaration of function
> > ‘scsi_sg_count’
> > drivers/usb/image/microtek.c: In function ‘mts_do_sg’:
> > drivers/usb/image/microtek.c:517: warning: implicit declaration of function
> > ‘scsi_sglist’
> > drivers/usb/image/microtek.c:517: warning: assignment makes pointer from
> > integer without a cast
> > drivers/usb/image/microtek.c: In function ‘mts_build_transfer_context’:
> > drivers/usb/image/microtek.c:553: warning: implicit declaration of function
> > ‘scsi_bufflen’
> > drivers/usb/image/microtek.c:558: warning: assignment makes pointer from
> > integer without a cast
>
> These would appear to be because you're not building against scsi-misc
> rather than because of a failure in the patch.
Thanks. Which tree should I test against? Where do I get it?
Regards
Oliver
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
