lockdep noticed that with ATA support the port->dev_list_lock was
entangled at irq context, so it now needs to become IRQ safe

---
This applies against the aic94xx-sas-2.6 tree

James

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_discover.c 
b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_discover.c
index a18c0f6..ce3385c 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_discover.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_discover.c
@@ -292,9 +292,9 @@ static int sas_get_port_device(struct asd_sas_port *port)
        port->disc.max_level = 0;
 
        dev->rphy = rphy;
-       spin_lock(&port->dev_list_lock);
+       spin_lock_irqsave(&port->dev_list_lock, flags);
        list_add_tail(&dev->dev_list_node, &port->dev_list);
-       spin_unlock(&port->dev_list_lock);
+       spin_unlock_irqrestore(&port->dev_list_lock, flags);
 
        return 0;
 }
@@ -688,12 +688,14 @@ static void sas_discover_domain(struct work_struct *work)
        }
 
        if (error) {
+               unsigned long flags;
+
                sas_rphy_free(dev->rphy);
                dev->rphy = NULL;
 
-               spin_lock(&port->dev_list_lock);
+               spin_lock_irqsave(&port->dev_list_lock, flags);
                list_del_init(&dev->dev_list_node);
-               spin_unlock(&port->dev_list_lock);
+               spin_unlock_irqrestore(&port->dev_list_lock, flags);
 
                kfree(dev); /* not kobject_register-ed yet */
                port->port_dev = NULL;
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c 
b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c
index d05fc23..1c15f37 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c
@@ -628,6 +628,7 @@ static struct domain_device *sas_ex_discover_end_dev(
        struct domain_device *child = NULL;
        struct sas_rphy *rphy;
        int res;
+       unsigned long flags;
 
        if (phy->attached_sata_host || phy->attached_sata_ps)
                return NULL;
@@ -677,9 +678,9 @@ static struct domain_device *sas_ex_discover_end_dev(
 
                child->rphy = rphy;
 
-               spin_lock(&parent->port->dev_list_lock);
+               spin_lock_irqsave(&parent->port->dev_list_lock, flags);
                list_add_tail(&child->dev_list_node, &parent->port->dev_list);
-               spin_unlock(&parent->port->dev_list_lock);
+               spin_unlock_irqrestore(&parent->port->dev_list_lock, flags);
 
                res = sas_discover_sata(child);
                if (res) {
@@ -701,9 +702,9 @@ static struct domain_device *sas_ex_discover_end_dev(
                child->rphy = rphy;
                sas_fill_in_rphy(child, rphy);
 
-               spin_lock(&parent->port->dev_list_lock);
+               spin_lock_irqsave(&parent->port->dev_list_lock, flags);
                list_add_tail(&child->dev_list_node, &parent->port->dev_list);
-               spin_unlock(&parent->port->dev_list_lock);
+               spin_unlock_irqrestore(&parent->port->dev_list_lock, flags);
 
                res = sas_discover_end_dev(child);
                if (res) {
@@ -767,6 +768,7 @@ static struct domain_device *sas_ex_discover_expander(
        struct sas_expander_device *edev;
        struct asd_sas_port *port;
        int res;
+       unsigned long flags;
 
        if (phy->routing_attr == DIRECT_ROUTING) {
                SAS_DPRINTK("ex %016llx:0x%x:D <--> ex %016llx:0x%x is not "
@@ -816,9 +818,9 @@ static struct domain_device *sas_ex_discover_expander(
        sas_fill_in_rphy(child, rphy);
        sas_rphy_add(rphy);
 
-       spin_lock(&parent->port->dev_list_lock);
+       spin_lock_irqsave(&parent->port->dev_list_lock, flags);
        list_add_tail(&child->dev_list_node, &parent->port->dev_list);
-       spin_unlock(&parent->port->dev_list_lock);
+       spin_unlock_irqrestore(&parent->port->dev_list_lock, flags);
 
        res = sas_discover_expander(child);
        if (res) {


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to