On Thu, 08 Nov 2007 10:32:56 +0200
Benny Halevy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov. 08, 2007, 5:13 +0200, FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, 06 Nov 2007 20:16:19 +0200
> > Boaz Harrosh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> - If we export scsi_init_io()/scsi_release_buffers() instead of
> >> scsi_{alloc,free}_sgtable() from scsi_lib than tgt code is
> >> much more insulated from scsi_lib changes. As a bonus it will
> >> also gain bidi capability when it comes.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Boaz Harrosh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > Looks good for me except for this:
> >
> > ./scripts/checkpatch.pl ~/Mail/kernel/scsi/28814
> > ERROR: use tabs not spaces
> > #101: FILE: drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c:741:
> > + gfp_t gfp_mask)$
>
> Come on Tomo, tabs should be used for nesting, not for decoration.
> This way no matter what's your tab expansion setup is the
> code will look correct and will make sense. The number of space
I've never heard about that rule. I use tabs and minimum spaces for
decoration.
But it's just about the style. The patch is fine by me if you like to
use only spaces there.
Thanks,
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
