Hi Hannes,

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Hannes Reinecke) writes:

> This adds a new SPC-3 ALUA hardware handler for multipathing.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

<snip>

> +#define TPGS_STATE_OPTIMIZED         0x0
> +#define TPGS_STATE_NONOPTIMIZED              0x1
> +#define TPGS_STATE_STANDBY           0x2
> +#define TPGS_STATE_UNAVAILABLE               0x3
> +#define TPGS_STATE_OFFLINE           0xe

SPC-3 (at least the draft, rev 23 I'm looking at) doesn't know an
'Offline' state - I think it's a SPC-4 feature. So maybe 'Unavailable'
should be interpreted as path failure as well / instead?

<snip>

> +/*
> + * SET TARGET GROUP STATES endio handler
> + *
> + * We only have to test here if we should resubmit the command;
> + * any other error is assumed as a failure.
> + * Maybe we should analyze the sensebuffer here, too.
> + */
> +static void stpg_endio(struct request *req, int error)
> +{
> +     struct hw_handler *hwh = req->end_io_data;
> +     struct alua_handler *h = hwh->context;
> +
> +     switch(host_byte(error)) {
> +     case DID_BUS_BUSY:
> +             if (!h->retry)
> +                     break;
> +             h->retry--;
> +     case DID_REQUEUE:
> +     case DID_IMM_RETRY:
> +             dm_enqueue_hw_workq(hwh);
> +             goto done;
> +     }
> +
> +     if (had_failures(req, error)) {
> +             if (h->tpgs & TPGS_MODE_IMPLICIT) {
> +                     /* Ignore errors; the array will figure it out */
> +                     DMWARN("%s: stpg failed %x, disabling explicit mode",
> +                            h->path->dev->name, error);
> +                     h->tpgs &= ~TPGS_MODE_EXPLICIT;
> +                     dm_enqueue_hw_workq(hwh);
> +             } else {
> +                     DMWARN("%s: stpg failed %x, disable path",
> +                            h->path->dev->name, error);
> +                     dm_pg_init_complete(h->path, MP_FAIL_PATH);
> +             }
> +     } else {
> +             DMWARN("%s: port group %02x new state %c",
> +                    h->path->dev->name, h->group_id,
> +                    print_alua_state(h->state) );
> +             dm_pg_init_complete(h->path, 0);

Hmmm, maybe I'm just missing something so CMIIW, but I think the PG
state should be retrieved once more before finally calling
dm_pg_init_complete(), because the target might return the STPG command
before the transition has completed (SPC-3, 6.31). This could confuse
application clients?

Arne
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to